Bill C-51: Canadian Natural Health Coalition Policy Statement

INTRODUCTION

Bill C‐51 presents a direct threat to the rights of Canadians to access safe, effective and low‐cost natural health products (NHPs). This proposal would reverse the regulatory reforms that Canadians campaigned for and Parliament approved.

This legislation is just the latest assault by Health Canada (HC) intended to restrict the freedom Canadians have to choose NHPs for their health and well‐being. If passed, Bill C‐51 would give enormous powers to HC. It is certain that these will be used to strangle and marginalize NHPs.

Bill C‐51 does not directly impose sanctions on the availability to the public of natural health products. Instead, it would confer on Health Canada the power to impose sanctions later, at their discretion, one piece at a time, when the opportunity is ripe. Health Canada has always been hostile to natural health products. Bill C‐51 will provide them with the weaponry to complete the job.

Apologists for Bill C‐51 try to deflect public concerns about its grim provisions by claiming “it is not the intention” of the bill or its advocates that it will be used to suppress natural health products. Canadians are being asked to trust these soothing assurances about Bill C‐51’s “intentions”. We have heard this all before.

THE GOOD ‘INTENTIONS’ BEHIND BILL C-51

It was the “intention” of Parliament that Health Canada would implement its approval, in March 1999, of the Standing Committee on Health’s (SCOH) report, Natural Health Products: A New Vision which featured 53 specific Recommendations. This was the culmination of a large‐scale public campaign to ensure better access to NHPs through major regulatory reform. Despite Health Canada’s bitter resistance Parliament agreed with the public and approved a significant package of reforms.

These mandated reforms have not been carried out. Would someone in the government and Parliament account for this situation? Despite the combination of public support and Parliament’ “intentions”, Health Canada has insubordinately refused to implement them. Parliaments pass legislation and governments give orders but the record shows HC pursues its own agenda which is vindictively hostile to natural health. Who is running the show?

We don’t doubt the good‐faith of MPs professed intentions. We just see that they can’t deliver the goods. If the intentions of Parliament carried any weight we wouldn’t have to have this fight again.

Parliament and the government have lost control over the management at HC. We say: Health Canada is a rogue agency. Canadians are confronted with a breakdown of good governance and accountability over this department.

This is the public’s health care system. We own it. Parliament is our trustee. More Canadians than ever favour natural health. We say to our politicians: e are not going away. The current regime at Health Canada must go away. e will fight until we see the public interest on natural health respected in policy and practice. We re tired of the tail wagging the dog and we want this fixed – permanently.

The Canadian Natural Health Coalition (CNHC) calls on Parliament and the government to re‐assert roper management and oversight of Health Canada. We call for a thorough house‐cleaning and reform of that agency which we have lost confidence in and respect for. We call for a Regime Change at Health Canada. After which, the public may again have confidence in the intentions of its legislators.

HOW BILL C - 51 WILL HURT CANADIANS

Canadians won the right to have natural health products formally confirmed as a third independent category within the current legislation on a peer basis with the existing categories – Foods and Drugs. This has not happened. Health Canada has obstructed every legislative opportunity to carry our Parliament’s instructions.

Canadians won the right to have natural health products formally confirmed as a third category within the current legislation on a peer basis with the other legal categories ‐ Foods and Drugs. This has not happened. HC has obstructed every legislative opportunity to carry out its duty to have made this so. Instead, we have been fobbed off with a mere third directorate ‐ the Natural Health Products Directorate (NHPD). This directorate is a wholly‐owned subsidiary of the Therapeutics Product Programme (TPP) aka the Drugs Directorate ‐ re‐branded.

NHPs remain as drugs under the current system. Bill C‐51 proposes to re‐define the definition of ‘drug’ into the nebulous concept of “Therapeutic Products”. The entire reason for this is initiative is to construct a categorical umbrella wide enough to embrace the upstart NHPs so their rapid growth can be contained. Health Canada is wasting taxpayer’s money and abusing the public trust by pursuing this unauthorized vendetta against natural health products.

If Bill C‐51 is passed, Health Canada’s plans are transparent. Health Canada officials have been bruiting their intentions throughout the natural health products industry. With the NHPD under its thumb a new Natural Products Directorate (NPD) will be positioned jurisdictionally between the Drugs Directorate and the NHPD. This new NPD will regulate all ‘natural’ ingredients and products that are held to have ‘therapeutic potential’.

Since in HC dogma only drugs can deliver therapeutic benefits ipso facto any substance with therapeutic potential is automatically designated as a drug, even if the substance is demonstrably not a drug as in the case of an NHP.

Health Canada simply refuses to acknowledge that Natural Health Products are qualitatively distinct from pharmaceutical drugs. They refuse to evaluate NHPs according to their intrinsic properties.

We – the Canadian public and our members of Parliament – are being forced to fight over the same ground we already decided on. Health Canada’s insistence that Natural Health Products be forced through the Procrustean Bed of pharmaceutical criteria is scientifically and clinically without basis, is contrary to the public interest, and provides plain sight evidence of their disloyalty as a public agency.

Thanks to Bill C‐51, Health Canada will be able to strip the NHPD of jurisdiction over most of its ingredients and products vesting these products under the Natural Products Directorate, including the majority of NHPD applicants who are facing final disallowance. Therefore, the NHPD will be left with authority over wheat germ and alfalfa tablets.

Since Natural Products are deemed to be capable of ‘therapeutic potential’ (i.e. can do something useful) ex‐NHPD ingredients will now be subject to pharmaceutical‐type evaluation under the NPD. Since these substances are not drugs to begin with these products will not be approved. The current tsunami of unapproved NHPD applications will soon manifest as failed NHPs and be forced off the market.

Thanks to Bill C‐51, Health Canada will be able to move the goalposts anywhere it likes. The standards of evidence, the burden of proof, the review process, the reviewers, enforcement, investigation ‐ everything can be moved around and manipulated at Health Canada’s enhanced discretion. These powers have always been abused. Health Canada gets to make the rules, hires ‘ringers’ as reviewers and then uses selected enforcement to punish or reward. The whole system is stage managed to ‘appear’ as formally correct but in practice it is rotten and corrupt. Bill C‐51 will make sure that the regulation of natural ingredients by Health Canada will become just as debased as they have become for pharmaceutical medicaments what with the endemic payoffs, conflicts of interest, corruption, malpractice, bad ethics and outright lying that characterizes that field. And

thanks to Bill C‐51, Health Canada will have the means to subject Canadians to the additional restrictions against natural health products that derive from the Codex Alimentarius.

What few products are allowed by the NPD must perforce have their public access restricted as all ‘therapeutic’ products ‐‘drugs’ ‐ are deemed to have the potential to cause harm. Under this new regime, they simply cannot be sold openly like Natural Health Products.

Thanks to Bill C‐51, Health Canada will be able to require that ‘therapeutic’ Natural Products be accessible only on the prescription of a licensed practitioner as each province variably defines that.

What a nightmare of enforcement problems that will set off compounding this is the well established fact that physicians generally have no training or competence in the use of natural health products while other well trained practitioners are not licensed. Such products of course, must be ‘dispensed’ from controlled facilities known as pharmacies.

Health Canada aims to choke off product availability of NHPs to Canadians. These actions will force a person living in Quebec who now routinely buys an NHP locally to travel to Ontario and engage in the services of a licensed Naturopathic physician (ND) since the Province of Quebec does not recognize Naturopaths. That ND could write a prescription for the desired product ONLY if it remained available for sale on the Short List of the NPD. Also, the poor patient would have to find a drug store that even knew what the product was.

The whole point of what Health Canada is doing is place as many obstacles as possible in the way of consumers trying to access Natural Health Products just as they have rigged the system to frustrate suppliers who want to develop and market products.

This scenario is not speculative, it is pending. Health Canada personnel are already bragging about it. Our tax dollars at work. With Bill C‐51, Health Canada is working to restrain the rapid growth of the Natural Health Products sector. As far as Health Canada is concerned too many Canadians are using too many NHPs for therapeutic purposes. We are getting out of control and must be forced back into line “for our own good”.

HEALTH CANADA : ECONOMIC SABOTEUR

Health Canada’s campaign against NHPs directly harms the economic welfare of the large number of Canadians whose livelihood is invested in this growing business sector. There a lot of jobs at stake. Growers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers, health professionals and researchers all will suffer if Health Canada’s repressive desires take force. The regulatory chill and hostility that Health Canada directs towards natural health – something which is widely known ‐ will confine Canada in the backwaters of a high‐growth international industry.

Of course, the well paid and tenured HC bureaucracy could not care less about other people’s jobs, businesses, practices or investments. Members of Parliament must take cognizance of this. They must be supporting the development of a healthy NHP industry which is rich in entrepreneurial vitality instead of allowing Health Canada to strangle it.

We say: Stop Health Canada from destroying a Healthy industry.

The greatest crisis facing Canadians in our health care system is the growing tension between constantly rising costs and declining outcomes. When Canadians use natural health products they ease the burden on the health care system. This deserves to be recognized by our Members of Parliament. NHPs have the best safety record of all classes of medicaments. If pharmaceutical drugs were held to the same safety standard as Natural Health Products, there would be very few of them left.

Health Canada’s reckless actions will directly result in the development of an underground market for Natural Health Products. We can look forward to grandmothers being busted by HC brownshirts for possession of carnitine. Popular U.S., Japanese or European products that Health Canada refuses to approve will nevertheless find their way to market on a large scale. This is very bad public policy in the making.

To our Members of Parliament: with costs of adverse effects from prescription drug use going through the roof, how do you justify sanctioning the expense of Health Canada’s large‐scale campaign against ultra‐safe NHPs?

NHPs are clinically effective; their preventative properties benefit consumers and this reduces the demand on high priced taxpayer‐funded conventional medicine. They are largely used by people who have actively taken control of their health. Why is it not public policy to support such tendencies? Dollar against dollar, measure against measure – benefits, adverse effects, compliance ‐ NHPs deliver a better return on investment than drugs. It should be the case that the widest possible use of NHPs is formally promoted.

HEALTH CANADA’S PHONY ‘CONTAMINATION’ CAMPAIGN

Health Canada claims they need the stern enforcement powers of Bill C‐51 because the public needs to be protected from “contaminated” NHPs. A clearer example of the culture of lying and deceit within HC towards NHPs could not be hoped for.

There is a large business being carried on in Canada selling fake drugs. They are largely sold through the anonymity of spam email solicitations or through the unwitting agency of pharmacies or by street trafficking like illegal drugs. A very small part of fake drug sales are made through the retail channel. Since they cannot be sold openly in a store just as they are, fake drugs have to be disguised. Sometimes they are represented as ‘herbal’ products. The fake drug masquerades as a fake NHP. The peddlers of these goods are not part of the legal NHP business. They are outlaws of the drug business.

We are not in the drug business. This is your dirty laundry Health Canada. The issue is not that REAL Natural Health Products are a problem. It is that HC allows drug carpetbaggers to graze into our territory. We say to Health Canada: Keep your drugs out of our Natural Health Products.

Besides, is there anyone so naive as to imagine that HC cares about the welfare of someone who got an unexpected Viagra response from a bottle of ‘herbal’ sexual aides they bought at the local convenience store? These bureaucrats are comfortably indifferent to the tens of thousands of Canadians annually who die or suffer adverse effects from the legal drugs they so blithely permit.

Almost every day Canadians are informed of studies or reports that find some approved prescription drug or another doesn’t work or causes serious adverse effects. About these things Health Canada does nothing. The hypocrisy of Health Canada on product safety is obscene.

While fake drugs are being sold, does HC attack the legal pharmaceutical industry? When fake watches or DVDs are sold does the government attack the manufacturers of legal watches or DVDs? On what policy basis then does HC attack the NHP industry alone?

Health Canada is attempting to smear the legal NHP industry by false association. We say loud and clear: There are NO examples of compliant NHPs being found ‘contaminated’ with fake drugs. HCs’ malicious allegations have no factual basis.

The government should order HC to stop this anti‐NHP smear campaign at once. The Minister of Health should conduct a thorough investigation and discipline the responsible officials. Canadian Natural Health Coalition calls on the Members of Parliament to see the following into law:

1. That Natural Health Products are consecrated as a ‘category’ on a peer basis with Foods and Drugs throughout all legislation;

2. That the legislation fixes the definition of NHPs to be that as currently applies for the NHPD;

3. That the legislation specify that NHPs will be remain available to Canadians in the public domain with specific prohibition of prescription status;

4. That all products containing only natural health ingredients and otherwise complying with Good Manufacturing Practices and labelling requirements be available for sale to consumers on a default basis.

WE CONCLUDE, PLAINLY

The Canadian Natural Health Coalition and the public will no longer tolerate the abuse of power from Health Canada. We will mobilize, organize and focus the power of the majority of Canadians who rightfully demand access to safe, effective and low‐cost NHPs. We will wage a ceaseless campaign to bring an end to the tyranny of the current regime at Health Canada.

To our Members of Parliament who at present retain our confidence, if you betray our trust we will confront you in the impending federal election. If you want this issue to go away and for the public to applaud you then fix this NOW. Permanently.

Drafted by Robert McMaster

Canadian Natural Health Coalition

Toronto, Ontario

www.cnhc.ca

policy@cnhc.ca

© Canadian Natural Health Coalition 2008

Permission is granted to photocopy or distribute this material, unedited.

This policy statement was approved by the CNHC Executive/Steering committee on June 11, 2008.

Bills C-51, C-52 Trample The Charter

The Spirit and Letter of Bills C-51 & C-52 are not about protecting Canadians from poor quality health products, but rather the destruction of the natural health industry in Canada. It moves natural health products, medical devices, cells, tissues, organs and drugs under the heading “therapeutic products”. It does not differentiate between drugs and natural health products. At this point the bill does not impact the Natural Health Product Regulations.

It defines a practitioner in such a manner that NDs will be denied access to natural health products deemed prescription therapeutic products. It also includes definitions of “sell” and “controlled activity” that differ from provincial legislation.

It also proposes sweeping new powers of enforcement with increased penalties including the ability to enter business establishments without a warrant. Now Health Canada will be able to break the existing laws of the country and operate outside of the court system. This bill will also give them the power to seize bank accounts without a court order, trampling on the Constitution and the Charter.

There is fear that the federal government wants to outlaw up to 60 per cent of natural health products currently sold in Canada. And despite claims to the contrary, in a short while, Health Canada will start recalling any products deemed having health and safety concerns. The concern is that this enforcement will be arbitrary and alarmist, and not necessarily based on a real risk of harm to the public, but merely on “suspicion of harm.” Who will be the arbiter of this suspicion, and what medical qualifications will they possess, for example in the highly complex medicine of TCM?

Prescriptions may not be needed at the moment, but with increasingly (perhaps unjustified) standards of evidence being foisted upon NHPs in the future, there is a potential for limited product availability. Inspectors will have increased powers to enforce regulations and achieve compliance.

Without this legislation being reworded and amended, a mother giving an herb to her child, could get arrested for engaging in the sale of unregulated, unapproved therapeutic substances. And yet, the fundamental weakness of C-51 is that it fails in requirements for transparency in pharmaceutical regulation. The pharmaceutical industry itself has a long and shameful history of hiding from the public studies that suggest drugs are not beneficial, and studies showing they are dangerous.

I think it’s obvious that we need to be more concerned about unsafe pharmaceuticals, rather than NHP’s, based on track records. Pharmaceuticals are known to cause untold deaths annually. Reverse the situation and insert the words “natural health products” into the above sentence. Now imagine the holier than thou shouting from orthodox circles. Insert sanctimonious and indignant remarks (here) and (here).

There is little doubt, that pharmaceutical companies are lobbying heavily for this bill. They see the huge growth and ballooning market in the natural food and health supplements, and would just love to get their hands on it, bringing it under tight regulations so these products could only be sold like drugs.

That brings me to the point of Tony Clement, who may have a conflict of interest. For example, he owned (and may still own) 25% of a Toronto-based chemical pharmaceutical company between the time he stopped being the Ontario Minister of Health and Long-Term Care (in 2003) and became the federal Minister of Health (in 2006).

So in the tradition of the Communist Party, Tony Clement and his goose stepping friends at Health Canada are trying to stick us with bills glaringly biased towards pharmaceutical companies. We should expect - indeed, we should demand - more of our government.

Aggressively Marketed Cereals Are Most Harmful To Health

The most aggressively marketed breakfast cereals to children have the worst nutritional quality, according to a new analysis of 161 brands. Many were shown to have more sugar, sodium, carbohydrate and calories per gram than non-children’s cereals, and less protein and fiber. Sugar accounted for more than one-third of the weight of children’s cereals, on average, compared to less than one-quarter of the adult cereals.

According to this study, one serving of cereal equated to 11 percent of the daily limit of added sugar for active boys, aged 14 to 18 years old, and an astounding 92 percent of the daily sugar intake for sedentary girls aged 9 to 13.

Think about that point parents, the next time you pick up that cereal box when your child asks for it. You aught to know that sugar and processed carbohydrates do not benefit your child’s health. Obesity has become a major concern for North American children, with sugar and carbohydrates being two of the major culprits contributing to this growing problem.

In the last two decades, the prevalence of overweight adolescents has nearly tripled, and current statistics show 16 percent of children are overweight or obese. Sugars are major contributors to this problem. They contain little in terms of vitamins and minerals, and the calories they contain are not made up of important micronutrients needed for health and growth. Out of moderation, they are harmful to overall health and have been proven to increase insulin levels, which can lead to:

• High blood pressure and high cholesterol
• Heart disease
• Diabetes
• Weight gain
• Premature aging, and more

One 2005 study [Journal of Pediatrics January 2005;146(1):105-11] analyzed the daily sugar intake of 5,000 toddlers ranging in age from 2 to 5, and found that, on average, 2- to 3-year olds consumed around 14 teaspoons of added sugar a day. This number jumped to 17 teaspoons daily among 4- to 5-year olds. If you are into common sense, then you’ll know that’s way too much.

Feed your children a wholesome breakfast like whole oats, which can have beneficial effects on appetite, insulin resistance, and energy metabolism

Sources:

• Reuters April 23, 2008

• The Journal of American Dietetic Association April 2008; 108: 4(702-705) (Free Full Length Article PDF)

Bursitis: The Ugly Stepsister Of Arthritis

Editors Comment: Bursitis, is a painful inflammation or irritation of the bursa (a soft, fluid-filled sac that covers and cushions the movement between the bones, tendons and muscles near the joints). The human body has about 150 bursae, and any joint from the neck or shoulder to the big toe may be affected by bursitis. However, inflammation usually occurs under the shoulder muscles, at the elbows (called epitrochlear bursitis or tennis elbow, the hip sockets (called trochanteric bursitis), heel bones (called retrocalcaneal bursitis) or the kneecaps (called infrapatellar bursitis or “housemaid’s knee”). It can also occur in the buttocks (called ischiogluteal bursitis) or the thigh (called trochanteric bursitis).

Risk factors occur with athletes who chronically overuse the joint, overweight people, occupations that involve heavy repetitive motion, particularly workers that are over the age of 45. Additionally, patients with the pre-existing conditions such as gout, arthritis, staphylococcal infection, and in rare instances, tuberculosis are at an increased risk for bursitis.

When a joint is overused or when it stays under pressure or tension for extended periods of time, a nearby bursa can become inflamed, fill with excess fluid, and cause pressure on the surrounding tissue, resulting in bursitis. The pain can be sudden and sharp pain following an injury) or chronic (a recurrent inflammation in the same area). Either way, it’s no fun.

The symptoms may include:

• Pain that increases with movement of joint
• Tenderness of joint
• Limited movement in the affected areas
• Swelling and redness in affected areas

The article below has excellent advice for treatment of this condition - naturally.

——————————————————-

Bursitis

8 Ways to Wipe Out the Pain

There are 8 of them around each shoulder, 11 around each knee, and as many as 78 on each side of the body. Most of them aren’t even named, and as long as they do their job, there’s no reason to ever notice a single one.

But let one stop working and you’ll know just how important those little sacs of fluid called bursae really are. And you’ll know just how painful the condition called bursitis really is.

Bursae ensure the smooth, frictionless working of the body’s many joints. They are so hard working, inconspicuous, and uncomplaining, one doctor wrote, “that even when one of them misbehaves, this is usually misattributed to some more important structure.”

And there’s no telling when it will happen. Bursitis strikes, it retreats, it strikes again. The on-again, off-again nature of acute bursitis is aggravating for sufferers and frustrating for those trying to determine what type of treatments actually work.

Compared with joint diseases like arthritis, bursitis is an ugly stepsister waiting for a date. Perhaps medical science will take greater notice of this wallflower affliction someday. Until then, here are some tried-and-true remedies that may bring temporary relief from this painful condition.

Rest is best. “The first thing you do with any joint pain is rest that thing,” says Alan Bensman, M.D., a physiatrist at the Minnesota Center for Health and Rehabilitation in Minneapolis. “Stop the activity that’s causing the pain and rest the joint. Forget that old sports adage about working through the pain.”

Immobilize and ice. “I will generally use ice if the joint is hot to the touch,” says Allan Tomson, D.C., of the Total Health Center for Natural Healing in Falls Church, Virginia. “Alternate 10 minutes of ice, 10 of rest, 10 of ice, and so on. As long as it is hot, do not apply heat to it.”

Attract relief with opposites. If the pain or swelling is not terribly acute and the heat is gone, Dr. Tomson sometimes recommends cold-and-hot combination treatments—10 minutes of ice, followed by 10 minutes of heat, followed by 10 minutes of ice, and so on.

Count on some OTCs. “I would recommend using an appropriate anti-inflammatory medication, as long as you’re not allergic to it,” Dr. Bensman suggests. “The one I like best is aspirin. Timed-release aspirin lets you build up a level in the blood without needing to take it so often. Enteric-coated aspirin (Ecotrin and Ascriptin are two examples) is absorbed through the intestines and is good for those with ulcers. But aspirin is still one of the best things going.”

Calm the pain with castor oil. The acutely painful stage of bursitis will usually recede in four or five days, but it can last longer. When the pain is no longer acute, therapy must be changed. At this point, heat replaces cold and exercise replaces immobilization.

Dr. Tomson recommends a castor oil pack, which is as simple to make as it is effective. Spread castor oil over the afflicted joint. Put cotton or wool flannel over that, then apply a heating pad. That’s all.

Become a swinger. If elbow or shoulder pain is the problem, doctors recommend swinging the arm freely to relieve the ache. Exercise for only a couple of minutes at first, but do it often during the day.

“You want to maintain range of motion,” says Edward Resnick, M.D., director of the Pain Control Center at Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. “You don’t want to get a stiff shoulder, but you don’t want to overstretch it, either.”

He recommends bending forward and supporting yourself with your good arm and hand on a chair. Allow the painful arm to drop downward, then swing this arm back and forth, side to side, and finally in circles both clockwise and counterclockwise.

Try a little cat tip. The importance of exercise following a bursitis attack cannot be overemphasized. Our experts all recommend stretching techniques to return full, normal movement to the joint.

An effective primary stretching motion for stiff shoulder joints is called the cat stretch. Get down on your hands and knees. Put your hands slightly forward of your head, then keep your elbows stiff as you stretch backward and come down on your heels.

“I tell people to walk their fingers up a wall in the corner,” Dr. Resnick says. “The object is to try and get your armpit in the corner. That way you know you’re getting effective exercise.”

Take time for ten. Some say the best cure for bursitis is one capsule of time taken daily for ten days. Sometimes less time is needed, sometimes more, but time is always the active ingredient.

If all else fails, say doctors, time will heal the wound.

Source: www.mothernature.com