Health In Motion

July 18, 2008

Deadly Fats: Why Are We Still Eating Them?

Hydrogenated vegetable oil has been banned in two European countries but not ours.

The Independent, Tuesday, 10 June 2008

They are the cosy, friendly foods that present us with a rosy image of our childhoods: Quality Street chocolates and Angel Delight dessert; Horlicks instant night-time drink and Knorr stock cubes.

As brands, they endure. Not quite as cutting edge as their more sophisticated and modern supermarket-shelf counterparts, perhaps. And certainly not as healthy. Because the truth is that some of the leading comfort foods we remember from our youth are doing their very best to kill us.

The culprit is one item, usually tucked away in tiny lettering on the ingredients label. It’s called hydrogenated vegetable oil. It sounds harmless enough, but it is one of the most dangerous products ever to be mashed into the food we eat.

Food scares are, of course, nothing new, but hydrogenated vegetable oil (HVO) elevates health risk to a whole new level. Recent scientific research suggests that it may be responsible for an unknown, but certainly very large, number of heart attacks.

Clinical researchers have discovered that ingesting just two grams a day of HVO – the amount contained in just one doughnut fried in this type of fat – increases an individual’s risk of heart disease by 23 per cent. This makes HVO much more dangerous to health than the saturated fats such as butter it often replaces. It distorts cholesterol levels, encourages obesity, causes inflammatory conditions, and can even be a cause of infertility.

Yet, despite the dangers, many major UK food producers continue to use it in everyday products. Brands that include it in their manufacture include Cadbury Heroes, some Nestlé and Mars confectionery, Batchelors Cup a Soups and even Haliborange Omega-3 Fish Oil capsules for children.

Nor is its use confined to retail food goods. Hydrogenated vegetable oil, or trans-fat, as it is sometimes called, is also widely used in bakery products, and by restaurants and takeaways, where it usually does not have to be labelled and declared as being present.

Given the risks, why do some of the country’s leading food companies continue to lace their brands with this deadly ingredient? The answer is predictably simple: cost and convenience. Trans-fats were discovered back in 1903, when oil was boiled to more than 260C in the presence of a metal catalyst such as nickel. The result was that its molecular structure mutated, turning the oil into a hard, greasy, grey lard-like substance looking, as one observer described it, like “the skin of a corpse”. The original purpose in making it was to create a cheap form of candle wax as an alternative to the more expensive tallow. That this wax could also be used in mass food production was a commercially sensational secondary discovery.

“Hydrogenated vegetable oil may look and sound disgusting, but in many ways, it’s a food scientist’s holy grail,” explains the health writer and author Maggie Stanfield, whose recently published book, Trans-Fat: The Time Bomb in Your Food tells the full story of its acceptance by the food industry.

“It can be used as an alternative to butter – it’s a lot cheaper, is taste-free, gives what the industry calls ‘good consumer mouth feel’, and lasts a long time. A very long time. An American TV programme recently featured a fairy cake made more than 25 years ago. It still looks perfect.”

These days, far less harmful substitutes are readily available, and some UK food producers now take advantage of them. Others, though, persist in their use. And why shouldn’t they? Trans-fats keep production costs down, and most consumers remain unaware of their dangers, believing, wrongly, that the real peril to their health lies in saturated fats such as palm oil and butter, which are actually far less harmful.

Given the weight of scientific evidence that has now built up against trans-fats, there is an overwhelming case for the Government to ban their use. This has already happened in Denmark, where legislation removing HVO from the food chain was introduced five years ago. Since then, the rate of heart disease among Danes has dropped by a staggering 40 per cent. The only European country to follow suit since then is Switzerland, which introduced a ban this April. Britain has no plans to take action, instead being content to leave the industry to get its own house in order.

Will it do so? There is little evidence of any enthusiasm for change. Legally in the UK, HVOs must be identified on ingredients labels, but to most shoppers it is just another meaningless name. There is nothing to indicate that it is hazardous to health. A voluntary deal was forged last year by major food retailers, but it only commits them to removing HVOs from own-label products. There is evidence that the deal is already being broken.

Professor Steen Stender, the Danish cardiologist who led the drive to ban trans-fats, says that voluntary codes never work. “Why should people need to know terms such as ‘hydrogenated vegetable oil’? The EU must ban their use.”

Having researched the topic thoroughly, Maggie Stanfield is convinced that the only safe amount of HVO we should be eating is no HVO at all. “When we eat trans-fats, our cells get confused. They identify the fat as unsaturated – it comes from vegetable oil, after all – but because of the industrial process involved, they can’t handle the fat as they would a truly unsaturated one.

“Instead, HVO actually changes the cell structure, making the wall soft, and acts like a pincer, raising bad cholesterol on the one hand, lowering good on the other. So the gap is widened, making us more vulnerable to heart disease.”

Stanfield believes that it suits the food industry to keep trans-fats a trade secret, doing little or nothing to flag them up. “They’re hugely useful to the industry as they have a shelf-life of years, don’t add unwanted flavour, don’t need to be chilled, and are very cheap, unlike the natural alternative. A chip shop can deep fry in HVO for a month, for example, where vegetable oil must be changed every few days.”

Given that there is conclusive evidence of the damage HVO does, Stanfield adds, an EU-wide ban is imperative. “What are we waiting for? Denmark has led the way, and the rest of Europe needs to get rid of these killer fats now.”

Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/healthy-living/deadly-fats-why-are-we-still-eating-them-843400.html

April 1, 2008

The Dangers Of Fast Foods

Filed under: Diet - Restaurants, Fats, Junk Foods, Lifestyle, Obesity, Refined Foods, Restaurants — Jorg Mardian RHN, CPT @ 7:05 pm

Editors Comments: Fast food is everywhere, at highway rest stops, airports, inside stores and even hospital cafeterias. But what is the real cost of eating all that high fat food? Take a look at the nutritional information for the food ordered. One can almost feel arteries beginning to harden and pants becoming too tight, just by the reading.

Still, every day, about one-quarter of North American adults eat at fast-food restaurants. Cheap, tasty, and convenient, fast food is loaded with saturated fat and calories, and it’s low in fiber and nutrients. Thanks in large part to fast food, more than half of adults in North America and one-quarter of its children are overweight or obese, double the rate of a generation ago.

The story below outlines some of the dangers.

————————————————————-

The Dangers of Fast Food
by author Kevin Vigilante, MD and Mary Flynn, PhD

Source: alive #215, September 2000

11.jpgWhen James Dean said, “Live fast, die young, leave a beautiful corpse” in the 1950s, North Americans were much thinner and fast food was a new invention. Today Americans are simply too chubby to live as fast as the lean 1950s idol. Instead they eat fast food, die younger than they should and leave increasingly obese corpses.

Along with smoking, substance abuse and inactivity, fast food presents one of the greatest public-interest health threats to Americans today. Fast food is almost universally dangerous and should probably carry a warning from the surgeon general. It contains meat-based carcinogens, is high in total calories and saturated fat and is a principal source of trans fat.

North Americans are always looking to shave a few seconds off everything–even eating. Fast food is a $103-billion industry and more than 25,000 new fast-food restaurants opened between 1996 and 1998. In a country obsessed with immediate gratification and conspicuous consumption, what could be more seductive than the capacity to consume excessively at a moment’s notice? The dominance of the fast-food culture makes it possible to have almost continual, unhealthy moveable feasts–daily.

Not only is the food dangerous, but it promotes a lifestyle and culture that are also dangerous. Our lives are fast, frenetic and commercial. Food should be our sanctuary from the madness, not part of it. It’s no accident that Dave Thomas, the happy CEO of Wendy’s who pushes the company’s burgers on TV, had a coronary bypass operation several years ago. As we can see on more recent commercials, he’s dropped a few pounds, but that hasn’t stopped him from hawking his products to the rest of us.

Fat Kids

North American children are not eating well. Approximately 30 percent of them are obese, up more than 50 percent in the past 20 years. In general, children eat too much, and much of what they eat is unhealthy.

A study sponsored by the National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine revealed that despite poverty and poorer access to health care, immigrant children are actually healthier than their American-born counterparts, having fewer short- and long-term health problems. The researchers noted that immigrant children eat fewer processed foods and more fruits, grains and vegetables. Unfortunately, as time goes on, the immigrant children acquire the unhealthy eating habits of American-born children.

Most people know that fast food is not good for you, but many don’t realize how dangerous it really is. They probably know about the calories, saturated fat and maybe even the potential carcinogens in the beef. But maybe they think they can escape the worst of it by skipping the burger and having the Chicken McNuggets or the french fries. After all, fries are just potatoes cooked in vegetable oil, right? Unfortunately the fries may be worse than the burger. Why? Trans fats.

Fast Food And Trans Fats

Trans fats are man-made fats that were virtually unknown to humans until 1911, when Procter & Gamble, the people who brought you Olestra, first marketed Crisco. Before Crisco, if you wanted to make a pie crust, you needed to use rendered lard or beef tallow as your solid fat source. But Procter & Gamble discovered that adding hydrogen to polyunsaturated cottonseed oil made it more saturated and turned it into a solid fat at room temperature. If you look on the labels of many manufactured food items you will see the words “partially hydrogenated”–meaning that the manufacturer added hydrogen to a polyunsaturated fat, making it into a trans fat. The more saturated a fat becomes, the stiffer and more solid it gets. Trans fats are also less likely to go rancid and thus have a longer shelf-life.

Procter & Gamble used what was abundant and cheap in the early 1900s–cottonseed oil–to build its partially hydrogenated evil twin–Crisco. In the 1930s the same technology was applied to the increasingly cheap and very abundant soybean oil. Today you will see that many oils are subject to this potentially dangerous process, sometimes even olive oil. Fast foods are probably the biggest source of trans fats in our diet.

Up until the late 1980s, fast-food restaurants deep-fried food in beef tallow loaded with artery-choking saturated fats. In the early 1990s, McDonalds, responding in part to public pressure, proudly announced that its fries would be cooked in “cholesterol-free 100 per cent vegetable oil.” While this was true, it was not the whole truth. The whole truth is that McDonalds uses partially hydrogenated vegetable oil. In other words, it uses trans fats, which are at least as bad for your blood cholesterol as the saturated fats they replaced, and probably worse.

In some ways this is another kind of high-fat fraud. You go into a fast food outlet and choose the fries instead of the burger, thinking you’re avoiding saturated fat. But it turns out that you’re no better off. Temperatures used for deep-frying liberate legions of deadly free radicals from fats. Even more frightening is the effect for multiple frying episodes. Fats that are used again and again for frying oxidize at frighteningly high rates.

The next time you see a basket of fries plunged into a vat of bubbling brown oil, you should get out of that place as quickly as possible!

We are surrounded by trans fats in many of the foods we eat, but the single largest dose we are likely to get is still the seemingly innocuous, cholesterol-free french fries from Wendy’s, Burger King or McDonalds. McDonalds is the largest source of these potentially fatal fries.

McDonalds understands that food is a cultural issue and it spends more than half a billion dollars a year promoting the McDonalds culture of eating. That culture is even penetrating public schools, places where children should be learning to make healthy lifestyle choices. Fast-food chains are now contracting with public schools to provide unhealthy, trans fat-laden lunches for our children.

In an effort to attract children to the McDonalds culture of eating, the company has created a cultural icon that rivals some of the most universally recognized symbols in Western culture. According to Rolling Stone magazine, 96 per cent of school children surveyed could recognize Ronald McDonald, making him second only to Santa Claus in name recognition and the Golden Arches are more recognized than the Christian cross.

March 24, 2008

The Food On Your Plate

Editors Comment: The following article (from thetrumpet.com) is decisive and razor sharp in it’s analysis of the food we consume today. Even if you think you know a lot, read it to brush up; it will shock you. Folks, we are being deceived at the highest levels and I hate to say it, but if you put your health in the hands of food manufactureres, you’ll eventually receive your worst nightmare – a deadly disease. Don’t bury your head in the sand and say it won’t happen. If you do, you’ll be just another statistic. That’s not fear mongering; that’s the terrible truth. The evidence is all about us. Turn around and stop following the crowd. Think for yourself…

——————————————————–

2junk-food.jpgMore has been done in the past 40 years to change people’s eating habits and the way food is produced than in thousands of years of recorded history! Is the average American conscious of what goes on behind closed doors in the modern food industry? Many will find the facts staggering!

Ninety percent of all food now consumed in the U.S. is processed. That means much of the natural flavor is lost and has to be reinvented.

The marketability of a food product depends on its taste. Thus, top-secret industrial complexes are scattered across the country, with refineries and chemical plants dedicated to re-creating or inventing new flavors—to assure a standardized taste for all their products. It is a multi-billion dollar industry. The consumer is steadily being separated from “real flavors.”

Eric Schlosser pinpoints the profit-and-power motive driving the food processing industry in his book Fast Food Nation: “The centralized purchasing decisions of the large restaurant chains and their demand for standardized products have given a handful of corporations an unprecedented degree of power over the nation’s food supply” (p. 5; emphasis mine).

One quarter of the adult population in America buys food in a fast food restaurant every day, seemingly without giving it so much as a thought!

We need to wake up to the reality of what processed food is all about!

Fast food is at present fully entrenched in American culture, to the extent that it forms one of America’s major exports. Fast food fits neatly into the average American family’s lifestyle—especially for Mom, who hardly cooks anymore.

Mr. and Mrs. America leave their fridge full of a week’s supply of ready-prepared, pre-cooked snacks and meals to heat up in the microwave. If they arrive home early enough from work, they may order a quick pizza to share in front of the television with the kids, or stock up at the drive-through of a local hamburger joint.

In the land of plenty and easily disposable, if perchance there is time for the family to spend together on Sunday and the sun is shining, they may go out for a buffet-style meal at a restaurant and get their fill of a broad selection of food. The restaurant chain’s sales pitch is, “Eat as much as you like!”—for an accessible price.

Mr. and Mrs. America and their two children, Amanda and Adam, find themselves in just such a buffet-style restaurant. As they take their place in the line, this is what they choose:

French Fries for All!

As french fries are so cheap to produce, there’s a fortune to be made out of them if you get the taste right. McDonald’s, the biggest retail company in the world, has its artificial flavoring down to a fine art; it now makes more money from its fries than from its burgers!

The oil in the fries, and the secret artificial flavor added to them—a hint of beefy flavor conjured up in a test tube—awaits the family’s taste buds. Cost is the decisive factor. The cheapest oil mix on the market, regardless of its health effects, is generally what gets used. In addition, repeated use of the same oil for frying can be seriously detrimental to the customer’s health.

One step backwards in the process and we find the soybeans, the cottonseed and the potatoes themselves have been genetically modified—engineered so as to produce their own insecticide and to tolerate exposure to potent weed-killers. The ground they were planted in has now been rendered useless for many other types of crop. Half of the soybeans and potatoes in the U.S. have been so modified.

What is the latest news in the world of potatoes? Last December a British company developed potatoes whose leaves have been implanted by a fluorescent gene from a jellyfish. The jellyfish gene, triggered by a protein that forms, glows when the plant is thirsty (Daily Mail, London, Dec. 18, 2000). Sound like science fiction? No, not in the 21st century.

Clearly, worldwide there is growing opposition towards genetically engineered plants, because of the unknown health and environmental risks. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (fda) is under pressure from health-watch groups for refusing to label genetically engineered products.

Drinks: Soda-Pop for All

Top soda-pop companies guard the secret way they mix chemicals with water, more than gold. Last year, a major shareholder protest resolution asking Coca Cola to stop using genetically engineered products failed to pass. Coke buys genetically engineered corn syrup by the tanker-full! Similar resolutions were filed with McDonald’s, General Mills, PepsiCo, Quaker Oats, Sara Lee and Procter and Gamble.

Mom: Chicken Nuggets

Anyone in Grannie’s day knew that giving someone sick meat meant endangering their health—perhaps their life! It seems the creators of modern processed food, as they drive the gravy train, have forgotten this simple fact.

The restaurant the America family is visiting is part of a multi-national chain which buys thousands of tons of broiler chickens every week. Broiler chickens are reared especially for their meat. They are housed in over-crowded sheds with up to 20 birds per square meter.

In the interest of profit, selective breeding, combined with 23-hour artificial lighting (which encourages constant eating) results in the species reaching its slaughter weight in only 38-40 days.

Nevertheless, the bird’s skeleton grows at a more natural rate. Consequently, the birds may not be able to support their body weight, causing tens of millions to suffer from painful leg disorders and lameness every year. By the time they reach slaughter weight they may have difficulty walking or reaching food and water. Millions die prematurely due to heart or lung failure or other causes.

The litter the birds stand on is usually not cleaned throughout the birds’ lives. As it becomes increasingly contaminated with poultry manure, corrosive ammonia is often produced; and because they have to spend so much of their time squatting on the ground, blisters often appear on their breasts. Ulcerated feet and burns on their lower legs are also common.

The health implications for consumers are irrefutable. Compassion in World Farming (cifw), a leading animal protection group, stated, “In 1996 a report by the Advisory Committee on the Microbiological Safety of Food reported that one in three fresh chickens on sale are infected with salmonella and 44 percent with campylobacter (although some supermarkets now say that they have reduced this contamination rate)” (www.ciwf.co.uk).

Here is the other side of the sword: Antibiotics are often routinely fed to broilers as growth promoters and as a preventative medicine against the infections resulting from overcrowding. The antibiotics help to kill the bacteria that live in the gut of the broiler, but there is a growing concern that resistance to antibiotics is building in bacteria that infect both the broilers and the humans that consume them.

More than 19 million pounds of antibiotics are fed to cattle, pigs and chickens each year as they amble toward the dinner table.

Amanda: “Just an Omelet”

The milk in her omelet, like most on the U.S. market, contains a whitener to make it look more appealing. In this case, titanium dioxide was used—the same chemical component used to whiten paint; but as the fda does not require companies to disclose the ingredients of their color or flavor additives as long as all the chemicals in them are considered by the agency to be gras (“generally recognized as safe”), food processing companies maintain the secrecy of their formulas.

Frank Spivey, a retired research scientist who worked as a technician in both the pesticide and paint industries, and as a designer of flavors in the food industry, says that some of the chemicals used in the pesticide, paint and food industries are the same—it is just that the proportions and amounts used are different!

It is rare that anything is wasted in food-processing. Milk on the supermarket shelves that passes its expiration date is often sent back to the factory where it is turned into cottage cheese, yogurt or sour cream.

The cows that produced the milk in Amanda’s omelet, like so many now in the U.S., receive a fortnightly injection of a genetically engineered growth hormone called bovine somatropin (bst) which boosts milk production by 25 percent. Milk produced by cows injected by bst shows boosted levels of the growth hormone igf-1 (insulin-like growth factor one). This hormone is also a suspected carcinogen. In addition, some research claims the hormone has been blamed for wiping out almost 20 percent of some herds. The cows’ immune systems become impaired, increasing their vulnerability to severe bladder and udder infections. Bst also weakens the poor beasts’ skeletons by draining calcium from their bones, resulting in the many cows that survive being unable to stand because their bones are too weak.

Then there are the eggs in Amanda’s omelet, which were battery-produced, processed and turned into egg powder. The hens that lay the eggs are imprisoned for life in cages where each bird’s living space is less than the size of this page. Such extreme confinement denies a hen most of its natural behavior, such as walking, stretching its wings, pecking, scratching or dust bathing. The hen is forced to stand on a sloping wire floor which causes considerable discomfort and often leads to foot injuries, feather loss and skin damage due to constant rubbing against other birds and the wires of its cage.

Thanks to selective breeding, hens now lay around 300 eggs per year, rather than the normal 12 that their wild ancestor would lay. As eggshells are made of calcium, this abnormally high number of eggs severely depletes the bird’s calcium levels, which, combined with the inability to exercise, can lead to osteoporosis and the hen’s bones snapping under her.

Ciwf has found hens in cages with their wings, legs or heads trapped in the door, and dead birds left rotting in cages for days. Hardly ideal conditions for the production of healthful eggs.

Parents, Amanda: Veggies

A British report by nutritionist David Thomas and backed by leading scientists has demonstrated that, thanks to modern farming methods, vegetables are not as good for us as they were 50 years ago.

“There is up to 75 percent less calcium and 93 percent less copper in fruit and vegetables, the study says. Runner beans which used to contain a significant amount of sodium vital for the working of the nerves and muscles now have almost no traces of it at all” (Daily Mail, March 5). According to Mr. Thomas’s report, “The levels of other important minerals such as iron, phosphorous, potassium and magnesium have also plummeted.”

By comparing figures over a 50-year period, his recent report was able to plot trends that clearly demonstrate how vegetables are being consistently sapped of the nutrients so important to human physiology.

At a time when experts are telling us to cut down on fat and eat more fruit and vegetables, surreptitiously the nutritional content of what we are eating is being depleted for simple gain!

Research has shown that spinach, famous as a good source of iron, was found to have 60 percent less iron than it did 50 years ago; broccoli has 75 percent less calcium, which is essential for building healthy bones and teeth; carrots have 75 percent less magnesium, which protects against heart attacks, asthma and kidney stones.

Nutritionists are also concerned about fertilizers, which encourage plant growth at the expense of the minerals important for good health. Excessive use of fertilizers also leads to residues of nitrates in produce and contamination of water supplies.

In addition, pesticides are now found deep within fruit and vegetables, not just on the skin. They can impair the human immune system and lower resistance to cancer.

Adam: A Regular Beef Burger

The tried and tested choice! Adam adds a thin slice of laboratory-designed, easy-to-melt, plasticky cheese and some company-designed sauce to the fluffy, bleached-white bun. Ingredients of the bread: “Enriched wheat flour (flour, barley malt, ferrous sulfate, niacin, thiamine mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid), water, high fructose corn syrup, yeast, wheat gluten, soybean oil, salt, soy flour, monocalcium phosphate, ammonium sulfate, calcium carbonate, mono and diglycerides, ethoxylated mono and diglycerides, calcium sulphate, datem, dough conditioners (sodium stearoyl, lactylate, calcium dioxide, calcium iodate, diammonium phosphate), dicalcium phosphate, vinegar, enzymes, calcium propionate and sorbic acid (to retain freshness).” The list is almost as long as Adam’s arm!

The beef in beef burgers is often stored in gigantic aluminum vats which store meat from the far-flung corners of the world, and from which the contents are ground and mixed with a predetermined proportion of fat. A single fast food hamburger now contains meat from dozens or even hundreds of different cattle.

Obviously, this practice helps spread infections and harmful bacteria, especially, of late, the potentially deadly E. coli virus. “A modern processing plant can produce 800,000 pounds of hamburger a day; meat that will be shipped throughout the United States. A single animal infected with E. coli 0157:H7 can contaminate 32,000 pounds of that ground beef” (Schlosser, op. cit., p. 204).

Although according to official sources an effective sanitary control system would only cost about one percent of present cost, there seems to be a general lack of will to employ even precautionary measures.

“Instead of focusing on the primary causes of meat contamination—the feed being given to cattle, the overcrowding of feedlots, the poor sanitation at slaughterhouses, excessive line speeds, poorly trained workers, the lack of stringent government oversight—the meatpacking industry and the usda [United States Department of Agriculture] are now advocating an exotic technological solution to the problem…. They want to irradiate the nation’s meat. Irradiation is a form of bacterial birth control, pioneered in the 1960s by the U.S. Army and by nasa. When microorganisms are zapped with low levels of gamma rays or x-rays, they are not killed, but their dna is disrupted, and they cannot reproduce. Irradiation has been used for years on some imported spices and domestic poultry” (ibid., p. 217).

Although the American Medical Association and the World Health Organization would have one believe that irradiated foods are safe to eat, most consumers are still reluctant to eat things that have been exposed to radiation. So, rather than treating the problem at its roots, the meatpacking industry is working hard to get rid of the unpopular word “irradiation” to replace it with the innocuous phrase “cold pasteurization.”

With the relaxing of health control standards in the 1990s, more meat splattered with hair, feces or pus is getting through. Some, like Steven Bjerklie, former editor of Meat and Poultry, believe that the widespread use of irradiation might encourage meat packers to speed up the kill floor and spray dung everywhere. Mr. Bjerklie thinks that reducing pressure on the meatpacking industry to make basic and essential changes in their production methods will permit their unsanitary methods to continue. “I don’t want to be served irradiated feces along with my meat,” he says.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (cdc) points to the seriousness of the problem. According to their statistics, if we use gastrointestinal illness as a common gauge of food poisoning, as we entered the 21st century food poisoning was 34 percent above what it was in 1948! The cdc says that every year, 5,000 deaths, 325,000 hospitalizations and 76 million illnesses are caused by food poisoning.

Dad: Traditional Steak

Chemically tenderized so that his knife will cut through it more easily, Mr. America’s steak was grown on a cattle ranch in the far north of Montana.

After visiting such a farm, Ian Cobain, New York correspondent for London’s Daily Mail, in a June 12, 1999, article titled “The Inside Scoop on American Feedlot Beef,” described his experiences. In his opinion, what British farmers did to cause bse (mad cow disease) pales beside the horrors of American farmers’ pursuit of profit.

“On this particular ranch,” he wrote, “thousands of cattle had been corralled into a series of steel pens, called feedlots, around 200 to each. There was no shade, no shelter and no grass on the ground, only dust. On each side of each feedlot was a trough containing herbicide-soaked grain.

“All of the cattle were enormous—the result of the grain diet and a series of steroid hormone implants inserted under the skin behind their ears….

“Because the cattle were carrying so much weight, and because their digestive systems are designed for grass not grain, some of the cattle’s internal organs had fallen out. And because it would be too expensive to call a vet out to treat these problems, a couple of sweating, panting farm hands in cowboy hats were going from cow to cow prising their organs back inside and stitching up the cows.”

Around 90 percent of the 29 billion pounds of beef consumed by Americans each year comes from cattle that have been fattened by hormone implants! American farmers have been merrily feeding an array of pharmaceuticals to their cattle since the 1950s. Today they routinely use six types. Three are “natural” sex hormones: testosterone, progesterone and oestradiol-17 beta; three are synthetic sex hormones. Like the steroids used by a bodybuilder, these substances increase both muscle and fat growth, making each cow heavier and increasing its weight by around 50 pounds. They also make the animals grow faster, so the farmer can take them to market far more quickly.

When the EU’s Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures published the results of its study on the use of hormones, it concluded that at least one, called oestradiol, is a “complete carcinogen,” because it can trigger tumors and promote their growth. The committee also called for further studies on the other five hormones.

Samuel Epstein, professor of environmental and occupational medicine at the University of Illinois Medical Center in Chicago, warned that confidential 1998 farming industry reports to the fda revealed high residues of hormones in American beef.

“According to some estimates, an 8-year-old boy who ate two hamburgers made from this meat would, following the meal, have increased his levels of the female sex hormone by 10 percent. According to Dr. Epstein, lifelong exposure to high residues of natural and synthetic sex hormones in meat poses serious risk of breast and reproductive cancers, which have increased sharply in the U.S. since 1950″ (ibid.).

The EU was particularly concerned by reports about cases of boys growing breasts and girls developing them early after eating contaminated food.

To reinforce its decision to ban U.S. beef, the EU published the results of tests on the small amount of supposedly hormone-free U.S. beef which was allowed in. When it discovered traces of hormones in 12 percent—including one substance which is illegal in the U.S.—it announced a ban on all American beef.

“There are around 42,000 feedlots in the major cattle-growing states, and around half the country’s 100 million cattle are confined within them. Some farmers using feedlots have begun research trials adding cardboard, newspaper and sawdust to the feeding programs to reduce costs. Other factory farms add manure from the chicken houses and pigpens, making the United States the only Western nation where it is legal to feed raw manure to cattle.

“Farmers are even reported to have experimented with cement dust, which is said to have produced a 30 percent faster weight gain” (ibid.).

Parents: Dessert—Strawberries

They look so big and red. Little does the family know that they are genetically engineered strawberries impregnated with fish genes to harden the crop against cold, frosty weather.

Children: Strawberry-Flavor Mousse

These are the ingredients of the artificial flavoring: amyl acetate, amyl butyrate, amyl valerate, anethol, anisyl formate, benzyl acetate, benzyl isobutyrate, butyric acid, cinnamyl isobutyrate, cinnamyl valerate, cognac essential oil, diacetyl, dipropyl ketone, ethyl butyrate, ethyl cinnamate, ethyl heptanoate, ethyl heptylate, ethyl lactate, ethyl methylphenylglycidate, ethyl nitrate, ethyl propionate, ethyl valerate, heliotropin, hydroxyphenyl-2-butanone (10 percent solution in alcohol), a-ionone, isobutyl anthranilate, isobutyl butyrate, lemon essential oil, maltol, 4-methylacetophenone, methyl anthranilate, methyl benzoate, methyl cinnamate, methyl heptine carbonate, methyl naphthyl ketone, methyl salicylate, mint essential oil, neroli essential oil, nerolin, neryl isobutyrate, orris butter, phenethyl alcohol, rose, rum ether, g-undecalactone, vanillin and solvent. Sounds tasty!

Scratching the Surface

Feeling they had eaten better than normal, the America family went home content. They enjoyed the tastes and textures, and ended up feeling full.

Artful creators of illusion in the artificial food industry and marketing moguls slap each other on the back with glee for achieving this type of reaction in the public.

This article just scratches the surface. Much more information about the murky goings-on and practices of those making the furtive changes—in many cases under the blind eye of the U.S. government—is out there for the reader to discover.

If permitted, greed will take these food industry powers further. Some are considering the use of by-products and offal meats, which up to this time have only been used to make pet food, as ingredients in processed food products—with their own invented, market-studied flavors prettied up, packaged and marketed for human consumption! (Antioxidative Processing for Animal By-Products, Dr. Youling Xiong).

Just how far will they go, if the government doesn’t implement stricter controls?

Alarming reports are beginning to surface. According to the Washington d.c. Environmental Working Group, every day, nine out of ten American children between the ages of 6 months and 5 years are exposed to combinations of 13 different neurotoxic insecticides in the food they eat. “While the amounts consumed rarely cause acute illness, these ‘organophosphate’ insecticides (OPs) have the potential to cause long-term damage to the brain and the nervous system, which are rapidly growing and extremely vulnerable to injury during fetal development, infancy and early childhood” (www.ewg.org).

An International Herald Tribune article announced that “Most Americans carry detectable amounts of plastics, pesticides and heavy metals in their blood and urine, a government survey has shown for the first time. The substances include many that cause brain damage, reproductive problems, cancer and other toxic effects in animals.”

The impact of fast food and food processing industries on modern North Americans is hard to overstate. It’s all about power and making more money. That’s the bottom line! Governments have been wholehearted in supporting “advances” in this industry. Their modus operandi seems to be to generally allow a product’s viability to be tested on the market until it is conclusively proved to be detrimental to people’s health! In doing so they are playing with lives—and not those of a far-off enemy nation, but of their very own people.

December 23, 2007

The Real Deal On Restaurant Dining

Filed under: Diet - Restaurants — Jorg Mardian RHN, CPT @ 11:51 pm

Editors Comment: The following article is from cbcmarketplace. I am putting on here in its entirety because they did a great job both on television and their website with exposing how many calories are actually in your foods.

If you think restaurant meals are healtjier than the drive through’s, you might be in for a shock. Most people underestimated by about 1/2 the calories and were completely caught by surpise when told the truth.

So why is restaurant food information so hard to come by? Is there a reason certain information is left out on menu’s from family restaurants? You bet there is, and the following article tells you what it is. Read on to educate yourself if in the habit of eating out.

——————————————————–

You’ll Never Guess How High Calorie Foods Are At The Popular Sit-Down Chains

CBC.ca Marketplace, November 7, 2007

kelseys_tillsonburg.jpgWe’ve all been trained to think of fast food as junk food. We understand that burgers and fries and “breakfast sandwiches” are not good for us. Most of the burger chains publish detailed nutrition charts on their websites, and they hand them out at the counter if you ask. Maybe a lot of the choices are unhealthy, but at least the information is out in the open.

Here’s a surprise. The food served at your neighbourhood casual-dining chain restaurant is positively loaded with fat and calories and sodium, in amounts far surpassing those usually found in fast-food meals.

We had nutritional analyses done on 16 popular items from sit-down chains (see below for some charts). As Wendy Mesley reports, a single meal at one of these restaurants could actually contain more calories than most of us should eat in a whole day.

How To Stay Healthy Eating Restaurant Foods

Restaurant meals will probably always be a little richer than what you would make at home. Here are some ways to make healthier choices when dining out.

  • When you get to a restaurant, ask for nutrition information before you order.
  • Ask yourself: How frequently do you eat food away from home? The more often, the more you need to make healthy choices.
  • Ask for a doggy bag: If you’re trying to lose weight, set aside half or nearly half your meal right when it’s served.
  • Don’t be afraid to request food the way you want it: ask for dressings, sauces, gravy, butter and mayonnaise on the side.
  • “I’ll start with the salad, please.” Research shows that you consume fewer calories when you begin your meal with soup (not cream-based), or salad (with lower-fat dressings). If you partially fill up on foods packed with nutrition, you’re less likely to overeat on the stuff that may not be so good.
  • Look for cooking terms: Order baked, roasted, poached, grilled, broiled or steamed.
  • Beware of battered, fried, or in sauces of butter, alfredo, cream, rich cheese, rose, Bearnaise, Hollandaise or pot pies, hash and creamy casseroles. They are synonyms for one thing: fat.
  • Hold the salt: Soups and cold cut sandwiches are often high in sodium, as is restaurant prepared rice.
  • Beware liquid calories: Instead of choosing pop, alcohol or designer coffee, opt for real juice, milk and especially water.
  • Parents don’t want unhappy, unruly children at a restaurant. Chances are if you give them pop, a chicken fingers and fries, they’ll be happy and behave. Nutritionists worry children will associate junk food with having a good time. Not so bad when you’re only eating out occasionally. When you dine out twice a week (the average), it heavily influences their attitudes to food.
  • While kids’ meals might offer milk or veggies, the main dish is often deep fried. And they’re pretty much the same from restaurant to restaurant. For any kid regularly eating out, it’s hard to eat healthy. Instead of pop, let them have chocolate milk. Stick to skim milk if your child’s over two years of age. At least they’ll get some calcium. If you order juice, dilute it with some water to cut down on sugar content. Also, try to get some steamed veggies with their dishes, and cut down on the fries.

What Does That Work Out To In Hamburgers?

A McDonald’s Quarter Pounder measures out like this:

  • 420 calories
  • 20g fat
  • 619 mg sodium

So, OK, burgers are a sometimes food. But you may be surprised to learn that a number of the most popular menu items at Canada’s casual-dining restaurants make those burgers look puritan by comparison. Here are Marketplace’s test results, from an independent lab, compared with the Quarter Pounder.

KELSEY’S:

Classic Chicken Wings How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 1581 3.7
Fat (g) 102 5.1
Sodium (mg) 2907 4.7
Cajun Chicken Caesar Salad How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 720 1.7
Fat (g) 56 2.8
Sodium (mg) 1930 3
Chicken Fajitas How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 1484 3.5
Fat (g) 46 2.3
Sodium (mg) 4582 7.5

MONTANA’S:

Firecracker Sizzling Shrimp How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 549 1.3
Fat (g) 25 1.3
Sodium (mg) 2030 3.3
Country Cobb Salad How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 521 1.2
Fat (g) 34 1.7
Sodium (mg) 1433 2.3
Big Sky Burger How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 866 2
Fat (g) 47 2.3
Sodium (mg) 1406 2.3
Vegetable and Feta Burger How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 778 1.85
Fat (g) 35 1.75
Sodium (mg) 1397 2.2
Add fries to that… How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 440 1
Fat (g) 23 1
Sodium (mg) 1193 2

MILESTONE’S:

Baked Goat Cheese & Slow-Roasted Garlic How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 729 1.7
Fat (g) 27 1.35
Sodium (mg) 1408 2.3
Squash Ravioli How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 865 2
Fat (g) 27 1.3
Sodium (mg) 1024 1.6
Fire-Grilled Wild Coho Salmon How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 660 1.6
Fat (g) 30 1.5
Sodium (mg) 955 1.5

APPLEBEE’S:

Spinach and Artichoke Dip How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 1161 2.8
Fat (g) 75 3.8
Sodium (mg) 2234 3.7
Southwest Philly Rollup with Fries How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 1593 3.8
Fat (g) 90 4.5
Sodium (mg) 3926 6.4
Applebee’s House Sirloin with
mashed potatoes and vegetables
How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 682 1.6
Fat (g) 34 1.7
Sodium (mg) 1549 2.5

RED LOBSTER:

Pan-Seared Crab Cakes How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 456 1
Fat (g) 31 1.6
Sodium (mg) 1413 2.3
Crab Linguini Alfredo How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 1330 3.1
Fat (g) 53 2.7
Sodium (mg) 2999 5
Honey BBQ Shrimp & Chicken How many quarter-pound
burgers that equals
Calories 714 1.4
Fat (g) 12 0.6
Sodium (mg) 3443 5.6

What is shocking is the amount of calories in foods like salads, with certain dressings. Notice also the high sodium content in most meals. These are the type of things consumers need to know in order to make sensible eating choices when going to a restaurant.

Blog at WordPress.com.